🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.